Thursday, September 15, 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011
My Favorite Picture
Monday, August 29, 2011
First World Problems
Friday, April 1, 2011
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Wonderful Pictures In My Dream
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Random Pickings From "My Philosophy On Acting"
Friday, March 4, 2011
Monday, February 28, 2011
Henri Cartier-Bresson Talks About Photography.
Later I found this transcript of it. Reading it is as bit as interesting as listening to Henri's funny accent.
"HCB: To me, photography is a simultaneous recognition in a fraction of a second of a significance of an event as well as of a precise organization of form which gives that event its proper expression. I believe that, for reactive living, the discovery of oneself is made concurrently with the discovery of the world around us, which can mold us, but which can also be affected by us. A balance must be established between these two worlds: the one inside us, and the one outside us. As the result of a constant reciprocal process, both these worlds come to form a single one. And it is this world that we must communicate.
But this takes care only of a content of a picture. For me, content cannot be separated from form. By form, I mean a rigorous geometrical organization of interplay of surfaces, lines and values. It is in this organization alone, that our conceptions and emotions become concrete and communicable. In photography, visual organization can stem only from a developed instinct.
First I would like to say that it is only a rule I established in myself, a certain discipline, but it is not a school, it's not a..it's very personal. And I think that we cannot separate what we have to say from the way we have to say it, how to speak.
Photography is in a way a mental process. We have to know what to, be clear, on what we want to say. Our conceptions, our, what we think of a certain situation, a certain problem. Photography is a way of writing it, of drawing, making sketches of it. And in the form, things are offered to us in daily life. We have to be alert and know when to pick the moment which is significant. Then, it's just intuition. It's instinct. We don't know why, we press at a certain moment. It comes, it is there, it's given. Take it. Everything is there, it is a question of chance, but you have to pick and force chance to come to you. There's a certain will.
The creative part of photography is very short. A painter can elaborate, a writer can, but as it's given, we have to pick that moment, the decisive moment, it is there. Ah! I've seen this, I've been there. I've seen that.
When I started photography in 1930 there were hardly any picture magazines, there was no market. And I was taking pictures (..) things that struck me, interested me. I was keeping a kind of diary. And I still do keep a photography diary. And later, there were magazines, and working for magazines, you have to work for yourself, always for yourself, you express yourself. With magazines, they put you into contact with events important in the world, and you have a possibility of speaking to a very large audience.
Interviewer: Does that in any way affect your attitude toward a story when you're working for a large audience? Or do you still follow your own precepts, it's still the same intuition in a way?
HCB: It is the same intuition. You have to know in which framework you have to tell your story for the magazine, but you must not work for the magazine..you work for yourself, and the story. Communication has to be very (? diarational ? )..
Interviewer: Of course you are communicating. For example, you've made various photographic essays on different countries. When you come into a country do you live there for some time? Do you try to feel the...
HCB: You can't rush in and out. It takes time to understand, to have a feeling of a place. You have a general idea of a country, but when you get there, you realize that your preconceived idea was right or wrong, but you mustn't push the preconceived idea you had. No, reality speaks, and your impressions. And it's very important, the first impression has to be very fresh - just like when you see the face of somebody for the first time, you have a feeling. Maybe after, you say, oh, I was wrong. Because I didn't take notice of certain things, a certain smile, something, and a country is the same thing.
Interviewer: I wonder if you could possibly give an example. For example, your work on India. Which we in the West have some sort of exotic preconceptions about. Was that changed quite a bit when you first got there, and did that affect your work and your approach to the people?
HCB: It's a thing that comes through your system little by little, it's not sudden. It can be sudden..you have to live there, you have to know people, you have to establish relations, you have to be on the same level with people. You can't come as a judge and uh, you have to get close to people, you have to be warm. You have to like people. You mustn't be cruel, you mustn't be hard, you mustn't be tough, because it bounces back on yourself. You can express all that you feel, you can be shocked, you can be humorous, you can be less tender, all the sentiments you can express.
Interviewer: And that's all there in your attitude, it shows up in what you pick, I suppose. Well, in your approach, do you take many pictures, for example, of one incident or subject, or do you wait perhaps for that..
HCB: It depends, there's no rule, there's no..it depends, it depends. You have to be subtle and supple at the same time. Fit, exactly.
Interviewer: You've been known for never cropping your photos. Do you want to say anything about that?
HCB: About cropping? Uh, I said in that forward, we have to have a feeling for the geometry of the relation of shapes, like in any plastic medium. And I think that you place yourself in time, we're dealing with time, and with space. Just like you pick a right moment in an expression, you pick your right spot, also. I will get closer, or further, there's an emphasis on the subject, and if the relations, the interplay of lines is correct, well, it is there. If it's not correct it's not by cropping in the darkroom and making all sorts of tricks that you improve it. If a picture is mediocre, well it remains mediocre. The thing is done, once for all.
Interviewer: Well I guess that goes back to your intuition. It has to be there, completely..
HCB: Yes. And for technique, technique is not a thing in the abstract. You can't evade it. The technique has to be something to express what you want to say. You have to master your own technique, to know your tools to say what you have to say. Technique doesn't exist in the (abstract)..you have to know your lenses, but it's not that difficult. You learn it very quickly. It's like a typist mustn't look at his keyboard, and then he types. But then, when he knows how to type he's concerned only with what he has to say, it's the same thing. You mustn't use a light meter, you have to know exactly what, to weigh the light. A cook doesn't take a scale to know how much salt you should put in a cake. The salt you put to give, to enhance the sugar. It's intuition, it's instinctive, and it's the same thing.
Interviewer: I think that applies to all forms of expression, the technique has to be completely assimilated.
HCB: I think so. Yes.
Interviewer: Now, for example as a photographer, you yourself, the basic thing you want to do is communicate, I suppose like any artist in any field.
HCB: Yes, communication has been an important thing. You want to give something, and to know that it is accepted. It's not recognition. Recognition..in a way, success is dangerous. Success can affect us.
Interviewer: In what way, you mean..
HCB: Success is in a way as unjust as lack of success. What is important (becomes the recognition.) You want to give something to know that somebody will accept it. In fact, when you love somebody, somebody will not turn you down, your love is accepted. And this is communication to me. To give something which is..
Interviewer: To give and then be requited.
HCB: Yes. And not recognition.
Interviewer: I wonder if you can talk about some technical aspects of photography.
HCB: We don't need very big equipment. Practically I work all the time with a 50 mm, a very wide open lens, because I never know if I'm going to be in a dark room taking a picture in this moment and outside in full bright sun the next moment. So...
Interviewer: The compactness has become very important..small cameras..
HCB: It is very important. And people don't notice you so much.
Interviewer: In the old days when they had colloidal plates and whatnot..
HCB: I think with the 50 mm you can cover a large number of things. Sometimes, especially for landscape, you need a 90 mm because it cuts all the foreground which is not that interesting. But this you don't decide beforehand...I'm going to work with such a lens..no. It depends on the subject. The subject guides you, it's there. Your frame, you see it, it's a recognition of a certain geometrical order, as well as of the subject.
It's a question sometimes people put. "Which is your favorite picture?" And I must say the important picture is the next one you're going to take. We're not curators of our work. The important is to think about the next subject. Photography is a way of living. To me, my camera is an extension of my eye. I keep it all the time with me. But, everything depends on the way we live, what we like and our attitude toward life. What we are, in fact."
Friday, February 25, 2011
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Robert Capa Movie
Coppola, Alejandro González Iñárritu etc (I know you guys drop in here
and read sometimes). A movie about Robert Capa, the amazing war
photographer should be written and shot. And I should be in it. Quite
simply. This would be perfect. Come on, the world awaits this. Thank
you.
Monday, February 7, 2011
RADA Summer School Info For Applicants
sent him an email long enough to knock him out, then I thought more
people might want to read up on stuff, that I may or may not have
mentioned, so here it is. Straight up Copy & Paste, what of it?
"Hey Buddy,
Thanks, it's always fun to help and inspire young people haha. Getting
into summer school and shakespeare in action is easy, trust me. Anyone
really can get in as long as it's not full, and as long as it doesn't
say on their website "Course Full!" or whatever, there are places
left. We had a few people who had zero acting experience and got in,
so that's great.
Same thing with Shakespeare In Action, you just write on your
application (that you get from RADA's website) that you are interested
in Shakespeare In Action (there is a box you tick) and they consider
you to get in. I am sure you will almost 100% get in if you tick that
box and say you are interested.
The course itself it's sort of like this. You show up on day one,
almost 70 people are in line to get into through the doors, everyone
goes in one by one and get's handed a paper and all that good stuff,
you know "Welcome To RADA" brilliant. One one of the papers you will
see your name, and the rest of your group (you are going to be divided
into 6 groups) and your teacher's name on top.
Then everyone get's herded into a big theater where you all sit and
listen to your teachers who say "Hi My name is etc" And you follow
your teacher and rest of your group (12-13 people or something) and
talk to your teacher :-)
My teachers name was Bridget Pennet, if you have her, tell her Leon
said Hi, haha.
You will probably do one of two things. Either one play (but a short
version, we did Measure For Measure, 40 minute version) or your group
will do an assortment of different scenes from different plays.
Here is the thing that might make you nuts though, if you get into
Shakespeare In Action, after four weeks, then your summer course is
over, you get a script for a Shakespearian play on the Friday you are
done with your summer course (after 4 weeks) and it's a bunch of pages
and lines and stuff of course that you have to learn and memorize and
all that until NEXT FRIDAY (aka 7 days) there's a challenge for ya :)
That's more or less it I think, the accommodation via RADA where you
live on Charlotte street 99 (right across saatchi saatchi) is tiny and
modest it's alright, close to everything.
Maybe I should post this on my humble blog.
Good luck buddy, 90% of the kids are from USA and Canada, f.y.i :-) Good Luck."
Waste not want not. RADA, good times.
Saturday, January 22, 2011
From My First Self-Developed Roll Of Film
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
My Life's Dream
"One day I wiped out all the notions from my mind. I gave up all desire. I discarted all the words with which I thought and stayed in quietude. I feelt a little queer - as if were being carried into something, or as if I were touching some power unkown to me - and Ztt! I entered. I lost the boudary of my physical body, I had my skin, of course, but I felt I was standing in the center of the cosmos. I spoke, but my words had lost all their meaning. I saw people walk towards me, but all were the same person. All were myself! I had never known this world. I had believed I was created, but now I must change my opinion: I was never created; I was the cosmos; no individual Mr. Sasaki existed.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Celebrating 200th Post The Proper Way - Insight To "Thanks-giving"
Saturday, November 27, 2010
The Genius of Stanislavski
done to study with this god if he was alive around now. I am
continually amazed at what I read when I open up his books and just
like the back of his third book "Creating A Role" says at the back by
a journalist from "The Observer", "A careful reading is worth several
lessons in almost any English acting academy". I beg to differ though.
A careful read of his three books and to a lesser extent "My Life In
Art" (his auto biography) is worth several YEARS in any acting
academy, if the RADA summer school is any glimpse into what you learn
in RADA anyway.
I can't sit and read for too long. For two main reasons. When I read
my mind goes bonkers and all over the place when I read a paragraph. I
immediately take in what I have read and start talking about it in my
own head, so reading becomes a mentally hard-work exercise. And number
two, and more importantly, the books (more specifically, the one I am
reading right now, Creating A Role) is so jammed packed with
quintessential gems of knowledge you can only be amazed and learn so
much that after one hours read I am exhausted and need to step away to
take it all in.
Like I said, a careful read is wroth several years in any english
acting academy.
Creating A Role, P.95. Talking about when an actor works with a play
in his imagination THOROUGHLY and he KNOWS the character like the back
of his hands, like when you live with someone for so long you KNOW how
that person is going to react to this or that, he says;
"When the actor in his creativeness measures up to a remarkable text,
the words of his parts prove the best, the most indispensable, the
easiest form of verbal embodiment with which he can make manifest his
own creative emotions through his inner core."
At the beginning of studying of a part the text on your paper is just
a bunch of words that mean nothing to you. They are as alien to you as
a foreigner whom you don't know exists that breathes and lives on the
other side of the planet. But when you study and study and study, go
through the play with your imagination and your own mind there comes a
point when you, without sounding too cheesy, become the part, and all
of a sudden the text that at the beginning were completely alien, all
of a sudden, in that given circumstance that you find yourself in the
play/role, no other word could fit more perfectly to go from your soul
out through your lips.
Mind = blown.
More of this to come. I've been thinking way too much lately.






